A LEGISLATIVE agenda that seeks to establish an “independent”
biotechnology center and promote biotech-based industries is
currently being advanced in Congress.
In a speech read for him during the opening ceremonies of the
National Biotechnology Week in Quezon City, Sen. Edgardo Angara
disclosed that the Joint Congressional Commission on Science,
Technology and Engineering (Comste) is advancing a biotech legislative
agenda.
“[The] legislative agenda is directed toward the establishment
of an independent biotechnology center of excellence and promotion
of biotechnology-based industries,” said Angara.
The senator noted that the seed capital for the biotech center
being envisioned by Congress will be funded by a seed capital
that will be provided by the government. The money will be used
to conduct directed and impact-oriented research and development
(R&D).
He said the R&D spending of the biotech center should be
tax-deductible.
To promote biotech-based industries, Angara said legislative
policies should be geared toward the granting of incentives
to companies that invest in the commercial production of biotechnologies;
granting of incentives to multinational corporations that will
set up R&D centers in the Philippines; and the establishment
of venture capital fund and business incubators to help emerging
small biotech companies.
Angara noted that the local biotechnology sector is currently
being confronted by a number of challenges which include lack
of good scientists, low R&D spending and the lack of incentives
for investors.
The chairman of the Senate Committee on Agriculture noted that
the Philippine government spend only 0.15 percent of its gross
domestic product (GDP) in 2002 for R&D.
“What this super-technology can do for us in the future,
given a supportive environment, is amazing,” said Angara.
Meanwhile, two Cabinet officials cited the need to harness
biotechnology for the country to boost food production, develop
cheaper but effective medicines and upgrade the production of
commodities using higher-yielding crops with higher nutritional
content.
Environment Secretary Lito Atienza said government is confident
that “through biotechnology, we can get better results
to our ceaseless pursuit on prosperity and development.”
“If we do not use biotechnology for our favor, we may
just be left out by other governments and other societies who
would harness it for their own good,” he told a group
of scientists and biotechnology advocates.
Science and Technology Secretary Estrella Alabastro underscored
the need to learn from the experiences of researchers and open
channels of communication about new issues on biotechnology
and their implications.
“If we could wave a flag for biotechnology, it would
have three colors,” she said. “Red for medical,
green for agricultural and white for industrial applications.”
Proclamation 1414, signed by President Arroyo last year, declared
the last week of November as National Biotechnology Week in
a bid to sustain greater awareness, education and understanding
of biotechnology, including its many applications.
Biotechnology production developed by local scientists already
include biofertilizers, ethanol-production-inducing bacteria
and micronutrient enhancement products.
As early as 1998, high-level biotechnology research started
and developed products such as transgenic papaya resistant to
bunchy top virus and ringspot virus, delayed ripening of papaya
and mango, Bacillus thuringiensis (Bt) corn, and marker-assisted
breeding in coconut and coconut with high lauric acid content.