'With prices of rice and other cereals
soaring and granaries emptying, it might take a second green
revolution to avert widepread famine.'
South Asia's monsoon is a mixed blessing for rice farmers.
The rains fill paddies. Light flooding brings sediment that
replenishes soil nutrients. But almost every year, somewhere,
flooding is so severe it wipes out the crop.
In 2007, disaster struck the floodplains of the Tista and Jamuna
rivers in north-central Bangladesh. Over a million hectares
of farm fields were flooded, some inundated for as long as
3 weeks. Agricultural losses topped $600 million. A few pioneering
farmers, however, were testing an experimental rice variety
that tolerates submergence, and their plants recovered even
after 12 days underwater--three times longer than normal varieties
can endure. Yields suffered: They got about 4 tons per hectare,
about 1 ton less than they would have without flooding, according
to M. A. Salam, research director at the Bangladesh Rice Research
Institute (BRRI) in Gazipur. "The farmers were very happy
to get this yield under these circumstances," he says,
because many of their neighbors were left with nothing.
Submergence-tolerant rice and other new yield-boosting varieties
are arriving at a critical time. In recent weeks, the collision
of rising demand and tightening supplies has driven a phenomenal
spike in rice prices that sparked riots in Haiti, Bangladesh,
and Egypt. A dozen countries, including India and China, have
restricted rice exports, deepening the crisis. Exacerbating
a bad situation, rice production in Myanmar this year will
likely drop 6%, to 9.4 million tons, according to a U.S. Department
of Agriculture (USDA) forecast, after extensive damage from
Cyclone Nargis in early May. A storm surge flooded about 1.75
million hectares of the Irrawaddy River delta with saltwater
and destroyed embankments and irrigation systems.
The global food crisis grabbed the attention of G8 leaders
meeting in Japan last week. They pledged to reverse the decline
of aid and investment in agriculture and accelerate research
and development (R&D) to boost food production. Nevertheless,
the looming food shortage "is a story that's going to
be here for a while," says Philip Pardey, an agricultural
economist at the University of Minnesota, St. Paul. Demand
will continue to rise, he says, as the world's population grows
and more grain is diverted to produce biofuels and to feed
livestock as meat consumption rises. At the same time, Pardey
says, funding constraints have slowed R&D on improving
grain yields and have crippled developing country extension
systems, which get the latest seeds and techniques into farmers'
hands.
All grains are affected by the trend. But a rice shortfall
could be disastrous. In 2005, rice supplied 20% of total calories
consumed worldwide, including 30% in Asia, according to the
International Rice Research Institute (IRRI) in Los Baños,
Philippines. IRRI claims that two-thirds of the world's poor--those
living on less than $1 per day--subsist primarily on rice.
And production is stagnant. Over the past several years, more
rice has been consumed than grown--the difference made up by
dipping into world rice stockpiles, which peaked at 146.7 million
tons in 2001 but declined to 73.2 million tons in 2006, according
to USDA. Prices were already rising, then lackluster harvests,
export restrictions, and speculative buying sent prices soaring.
For example, a popular export variety of Thai rice jumped from
$362 per ton last December to $1000 per ton in April. Prices
have retreated to $720 per ton.
To balance production and consumption, IRRI forecasts that
by 2015 the world must grow 50 million tons more rice per year
than the 631.5 million tons grown in 2005. This will require
boosting global average yields by more than 1.2% per year,
or about 12% over the decade, says IRRI's research director,
Achim Dobermann. In the near term, he says, farmers could wring
an extra 1 to 2 tons of grain per hectare by growing the latest
varieties and improving farm management--everything from optimizing
fertilizer use to building rat-proof granaries that stem postharvest
losses. A long-term trial plot at IRRI produces 18 to 20 tons
of grain per year per hectare, but the average field in Asia
yields half of that. Existing technologies "haven't been
moved out sufficiently to farmers," Dobermann says, because
many extension systems are poorly funded and staffed. IRRI
runs a training program that helps address this issue (see
sidebar, p. 332).
In the long term, superior rice varieties are key to averting
widespread food scarcity, says Pardey: "The yield levels
we're seeing are historically high, and to even maintain them
let alone increase them, you have to run pretty hard to keep
ahead of evolving pests and diseases and other stresses." Given
how long it takes to develop new varieties, he adds, "you've
just got to keep priming the pump of the research."
Submergence-tolerant rice shows the years of effort it often
takes to produce a new variety. Flooding costs South Asia
about $1 billion a year in rice losses. Although paddy rice
is grown in standing water, most varieties die if submerged
for 3 or 4 days. Researchers had long known of varieties
that apparently evolved to withstand monsoon flooding. An
Indian variety known as FR (flood resistant) 13A can recover
and produce rice even after 3 weeks underwater.
Despite that advantage, farmers have largely abandoned such
varieties in favor of modern cultivars that produce double
or more grain under normal conditions. In the 1970s, IRRI tried
crossing FR13A with high-yield varieties. But farmers rejected
the resulting cultivars because they didn't like the taste
and had difficulty adapting the plants to local conditions,
says David Mackill, head of plant breeding at IRRI.
In the early 1990s, Mackill, then at USDA's Agricultural Research
Service in Davis, California, and colleagues at the University
of California (UC), Davis, set out to identify the gene or
genes in FR13A responsible for submergence tolerance. His team
hybridized a variety derived from FR13A and an intolerant rice
cultivar and tested hundreds of plants to see which recovered
from submergence. Using molecular markers, or segments of easily
identifiable DNA, they compared the genomes of the tolerant
and nontolerant offspring, linking a region of chromosome 9
to submergence tolerance.
They enlisted colleagues at UC Riverside and IRRI to isolate
the gene responsible, Submergence 1A (Sub1A). The group determined
that Sub1A is expressed in FR13A only when the plant is submerged
and that many nontolerant rice varieties don't have Sub1A.
To confirm its role, they introduced Sub1A into an intolerant
variety lacking the gene and got submergence tolerance. The
group reported its findings in Nature in 2006.
IRRI plant physiologists, meanwhile, concluded that Sub1A
inhibits stem and leaf elongation and the loss of chlorophyll
that typically occurs in submerged plants. Limiting elongation
conserves energy, and preserving chlorophyll, essential for
photosynthesis, enhances chances of recovery.
Mackill joined IRRI in 2001 and 2 years later started working
to get Sub1A into commercial varieties. Using marker-assisted
selection, which links a DNA segment to a trait of interest,
his team screened crosses for plants with Sub1A but otherwise
identical to the target variety. The Swarna variety popular
in India and Bangladesh was one of the first to get Sub1A,
and germ plasm was given to BRRI and its counterpart in India
in 2005. This year, BRRI has four varieties with the Sub1A
gene in field trials, Salam says. They will ramp up seed production
of the best candidate, which will take another 2 years. Varieties
are being tested in eight other Asian countries.
Production of submergence-tolerant rice will become appreciable
sometime after 2010, Dobermann says.
It's fortunate that a single gene confers a high degree of
submergence tolerance. Researchers aren't always so lucky.
In 2002, a team at IRRI, the Philippine Rice Research Institute
in Muñoz, BRRI, and UC Davis identified Saltol, short
for salt tolerance, on rice chromosome 1. A rice variety carrying
Saltol is now in field trials in Bangladesh. But Saltol confers
tolerance only during the seedling stage. This works for wet-season
rice, because adult plants are saved by monsoon rains that
reduce soil salinity as the season progresses. But dry-season
varieties face increasing salinity during the critical flowering
period in spring, when coastal groundwater turns brackish.
Researchers are probing for other genes that might protect
these types.
Scientists are using molecular techniques to boost resistance
to diseases and pests as well. "But with biotic stresses,
it is more complicated because you're defending the plant against
pathogens or insects that are evolving," says Dobermann.
Getting durable resistance to insects often requires several
genes with different properties, continual improvement, and
wise farming practices, as illustrated by the fight against
the brown planthopper. The tiny insect sucks the sap from rice
stalks and often infects the plant with viruses. Infestation
can be deadly. In the 1970s, the planthopper was brought to
heel through integrated pest management--which encourages the
use of natural predators--and the development of resistant
varieties.
But in just 10 years, planthoppers developed an ability to
attack resistant plants as well as resistance to a widely used
pesticide. Annual losses in China are estimated to run 2.77
million tons and in Vietnam about 700,000 tons, says Kong Luen
Heong, an IRRI entomologist. The root problem is overuse of
pesticides, which kill off the planthopper's natural predators. "This
is a problem of unsustainable practices," Heong says.
Breeding resistant varieties might help, he says, but to be
effective, new varieties must be integrated with changes in
farming practices. IRRI is planning a pest-management demonstration
project in China in 2009 that minimizes pesticide use.
Researchers have cultivars that are resistant to other stresses--including
drought, cold, and iron toxicity--in the R&D pipeline.
Teams are also working on genetically modified (GM) varieties.
Public antipathy, particularly in Asia, has kept GM rice confined
to labs. A variety modified to produce pro- vitamin A could
force governments to come to terms with transgenic crops (Science,
25 April, p. 468). IRRI now has the so-called golden rice in
a field trial, and trials in farm fields in Bangladesh could
start in about 2 years, Dobermann says. But he thinks it will
take at least a decade for GM rice to have a significant impact
on production.
Another factor slowing work on new varieties is the structure
of the rice market. Private companies conduct a lot of research
on crops such as maize and soybeans because there is a thriving
seed business. Rice farmers, on the other hand, retain part
of each season's crop as seed for the next crop, so there is
a smaller seed business and advances depend heavily on public-sector
efforts. Pardey says little public spending in advanced countries
goes to increasing grain productivity; instead, it is spent
mostly on fruits and vegetables and environmental concerns.
Contributions to organizations like IRRI have waned: IRRI's
budget has eroded from a peak of $44.4 million in 1993 to $27.9
million in 2006. And few developing countries, aside from China
and India, have been ramping up spending as quickly as they
need to, Pardey says. As a result, over the past 10 years maize
yields have risen by nearly 1.8% per year while growth in rice
yields has slipped below 1% annually and is virtually nil across
Asia, Dobermann says.
Closing the gap
Reducing losses to stresses can only partly ameliorate a crisis.
Varieties tolerant to submergence, drought, and salinity
are useful in environments that account for about 25% of
global rice production. "If we want to do something
in terms of food security," says Dobermann, "we
need to invest much more in improving varieties" for
the 75% of rice grown in favorable environments.
Recent improvements in potential rice yields have been incremental
in part because breeders have already picked the low-hanging
fruit. In a sign of the challenges ahead, Qifa Zhang, a rice
geneticist at Huazhong Agricultural University in Wuhan, China,
identified a gene on chromosome 7 that plays a key role in
boosting yield potential. He found, however, that most modern
cultivars already carry the gene. Understanding how it works
might lead to yield gains, says Zhang, whose findings appeared
in Nature Genetics last May. "But we'll have to be creative
in deciding how to make use of it."
Higher yields could come from greater reliance on hybrid rice.
Hybrids of genetically diverse plants benefit from heterosis,
or hybrid vigor, which produces yields up to 20% greater than
inbred varieties. China pioneered the use of hybrid rice in
the 1970s and now plants it on 16 million hectares, or 57%
of its total rice area. Last year, hybrid rice accounted for
about 65% of China's 186 million ton rice production, according
to Longping Yuan, director-general of the China National Hybrid
Rice R&D Center and a professor at Hunan Agricultural University
in Changsha. The average yield of hybrids is 7.1 to 7.2 tons
per hectare versus 5.8 to 5.9 tons per hectare for inbred varieties.
But several factors have limited the spread of hybrid rice.
Yuan's hybrids are indica varieties suited for the tropics.
His team has not yet produced an effective japonica hybrid
for temperate regions. In addition, Yuan admits, the hybrid
rice he introduced in 1976 "was just so-so" in taste
and quality. It was promoted by a central government anxious
to feed its people, he says. His center is striving to improve
the rice's taste.
Because of quality concerns, breeders in other countries have
been slow to adapt hybrids to local conditions. Hybrid rice
also requires a change in farming culture and infrastructure.
The practice of retaining part of a crop as seed works for
inbred varieties that are self-pollinating. But the yield benefit
of heterosis is seen only in first-generation crosses. This
means new hybrid seed must be purchased for each crop.
The drawbacks have limited hybrid rice to about 4 million hectares
outside China. But Dobermann foresees that total rising to
as much as 20 million hectares in a decade as varieties improve.
One alternative--looking to wild and exotic strains--promises
to boost yields of inbred varieties. For decades, breeders
have worked with a limited number of rice varieties chosen
for observable traits, says Susan McCouch, a rice geneticist
at Cornell University. Wild and exotic varieties were ignored,
she says, because they yield less rice than modern cultivars
and thus were not obvious sources of beneficial genes.
In the 1990s, McCouch and Cornell colleague Steven Tanksley
crossed wild and exotic rice varieties with modern cultivars
and then used molecular linkage maps to identify genes in offspring
that increased yield. They almost always found some yield-boosting
genes from the wild parent, McCouch says. They then added targeted
genes from the wild parent to modern cultivars. This strategy
appears to have an effect similar to heterosis, but the desired
trait is fixed and boosts yields in later generations.
Now about a dozen groups around the world are using wild rice
genes in this way to improve local varieties. Sang-Nag Ahn,
a rice breeder at Chungnam National University in Daejeon,
South Korea, and his colleagues crossed four elite Korean rice
cultivars with wild species. Some offspring yielded 10% to
20% more grain than the parents, says Ahn. The most promising
lines are in field trials; he expects to release the first
of these crosses to farmers in 3 to 5 years.
A more ambitious plan is to convert rice from a C3 to a C4
plant that's better at bulking up on carbon. C3 plants--the
majority of species, including wheat, barley, and potatoes--use
the enzyme RuBisCO to turn carbon dioxide into a three-carbon
compound that is fixed into the plant's biomass. Less common
C4 plants, such as maize and sugar cane, have an additional
enzyme, PEP carboxylase, which produces a four-carbon compound
that RuBisCO fixes more efficiently. C4 plants, which probably
evolved from C3 plants millions of years ago, are 50% more
efficient at turning sunlight into biomass. John Sheehy, an
IRRI plant physiologist, says that a C4 rice plant could boast
50% greater yield while requiring less water and fertilizer
(Science, 28 July 2006, p. 423).
Sheehy and colleagues have screened wild relatives of rice
and found some evidence of the close vein spacing in leaves,
the large numbers of photosynthesizing chloroplasts, and the
CO2-absorption high-pay characteristics that are typical of
C4 plants. "They are not C4 plants but are closer to C4
than normal C3 plants," Sheehy says. He predicts it could
take several years to prove that rice can be transformed into
a C4 plant and a decade or more to produce a prototype. That's
just the kind of long-term, high-payoff research that governments
should be funding, says Pardey.
A meta-analysis of hundreds of studies that Pardey's group
is preparing for publication shows "a pretty well-established
relationship" between R&D and increasing yields. They
also found that the peak effect of a discovery comes 20 to
25 years after the research was initiated. Conversely, sagging
growth in agricultural productivity is the direct result of
limited increases in R&D funding since the late 1970s,
Pardey says. Reversing the trend requires "a decadal response," he
says, "not a political cycle response." The rice
crisis that caught the world off-guard may take many years
to resolve.