Malawi has become the latest sub-Saharan African country to
approve a National Biotechnology Policy aimed to provide a
framework for effective implementation of biotechnology programs
and activities.
The Policy is an answer to a study conducted in Malawi in
early 2000 supported by the Africa Biodiversity Network (ABN)
to establish the status of Genetic Engineering (GE), Intellectual
Property Rights (IPR) and GE food aid in Malawi which found
that genetic engineering in general and agricultural biotechnology
in particular is only at a rudimentary level in Malawi being
confined to the second-generation order characterized by tissue
culture and application of molecular markers within the University
of Malawi.
The study revealed that Malawi has no biotechnology policy
save for the pieces of legislation mentioned above but there
is full recognition of the need to develop a national biotechnology
policy.
A Cabinet meeting chaired by President Bingu Wa Mutharika,
who is also the minister for Education, Science and Technology
approved the policy last week. In a foreword to the policy,
the President said his government recognized the pivotal role
biotechnology can play towards economic growth and poverty
reduction.
He said biotechnology will facilitate Malawi's speedy attainment
of capacity to be food secure, create wealth and achieve socio-economic
development as stipulated in the Malawi Growth and Development
Strategy (MGDS) and Vision 2020.
The Policy provides an enabling framework to promote and regulate
the development, acquisition and deployment of relevant biotechnology
products to reposition Malawi from being a predominantly importing
and consuming economy to a manufacturing and exporting one.
It is expected to create an environment that would allow biotechnology
business to flourish. With the Biosafety Act already in place
since 2002, the approval of the policy is expected to hasten
the country's plans to commence contained trials of Bt Cotton
and GM Cassava.
Over the past decade, issues of genetic engineering, intellectual
property rights and genetically modified food aid have gained
new research importance in many countries including developing
nations.
Third generation biotechnology (genetic engineering) involving
recombinant DNA has not yet been implemented in Malawi and
there have been no official trials of GM crops due to lack
of technical capacity, clear policies, legislation, regulations
and guidelines to drive the process.
Even government research stations have not conducted genetic
engineering activities despite harbouring interest in the technology.
However, the government recognized the importance of science
and technology in national development evidenced by the establishment
of the National Research Council of Malawi (NRCM) in 1974,
a body mandated to manage science and technology for national
development.
To strengthen activities of NRCM, a first science-related
policy, the Science and Technology Policy was adopted in 1991,
which unfortunately never bore fruit due to lack of proper
vision and funding problems.
A new Science and Technology policy was adopted in 2002, which
was followed by the passing of the Science and Technology Act
in 2003 in an attempt to revive the role of science and technology
in the country' development.
The latter piece of legislation calls for the establishment
of the National Commission for Science and Technology (NCST),
a body with similar mandate to NRCM, which it is assumed, will
be dissolved once NCST becomes functional.
Being a signatory to the Cartagena Protocol of 2000, Malawi
passed the Bio-safety Act in October 2002 to provide a legislative
framework for the safe development and application of biotechnology
and its products in Malawi.
However an examination of the Act reveals that several key
areas required by the Bio-safety Protocol are not covered by
the Act.
A closer study of the Act shows that its main aim is to manage
the safe and responsible use of GMOs and gene therapy and experts
are recommending that the title of the Bio-safety Act be amended
to GMO Act and the aim of the Act be amended to center on the
management of GMOs and gene therapy.
The policy framework will set out to address aspects including
strengthening of infrastructure to facilitate biotechnology
research, development and commercialization; strengthening
of capacity for development of biotechnology within government,
research institutions, academic institutes and the private
sector and establishment of a commitment to finance biotechnology
and bio-safety by the government, private sector and funding
agencies.
Malawi often finds herself entangled in food security problems
largely attributed to low crop productivity. The rural population,
consisting of over 60% of the total, is often vulnerable since
produce from one harvest often does not last until the next
harvest.
In such cases, food aid is sought from the region and/or beyond
to bridge the gap and Malawi was in such a situation in the
2001/2002 growing season when it was faced with a serious hunger
crisis in recent memory. The crisis was so bad that the country
was declared in a state of disaster.
Flow of food aid followed the declaration and in the process
300MT of genetically modified maize was supplied to Malawi
through the World Food Programme (WFP).
The consignment became an issue of great debate in the country
as various stakeholders and commentators advanced views on
it largely over its threat to local maize genetic pool if the
grain got planted.
The government finally decided to mill the grain so that it
is given out as flour instead of whole grains to curb any intentions
of planting the grain by the recipients.