It's sometime amusing to watch and listen anti-biotech activists
moralize about food issues. They purport to be God-anointed
custodians of our health. It's like we're so naïve to
take care of ourselves and that we are handicapped in deciding
which food is healthy for us.
Who can really entrust his/her health to activists? I pose
this question out of reports that Michael Hansen, an avowed
critic of Genetically Modified Organisms (GMOs), is in South
Africa drumming up support for the labeling of genetically
modified food.
For starters, Mr. Hansen works for the U.S.-based Consumer
Policy Institute, a division of Consumer Union, a fervent opponent
of genetically modified food.
The Consumer Policy Institute, after failing to prevail upon
the U.S. government to demand that all GMOs products be labeled
is now shifting its spotlight on poor countries that are struggling
to embrace modern agricultural biotechnology.
South Africa, which has made tremendous progress in genetic
modification, is one of the countries the Consumer Policy Institute,
through Mr. Hansen, is spotlighting on.
Mr. Hansen is demanding that manufacturers label GMOs products
in all South African supermarkets "…so that consumers
can decide for themselves whether they want to buy them or
not because firms are being given free rein to carry out whatever
genetic experimentation they want to without fear of any response
from the public."
Africa doesn't need the likes of Mr. Hansen to preach to it
about food issues. Perhaps, he and his sponsors should redirect
the millions of dollars they are spending on food label campaigns
to expedite the transfer of modern agricultural biotechnology
from developed nations to poor countries.
Africa's food problems are unique and would not be solved
through the activism of Mr. Hansen and others like him. Tangible
efforts aimed at alleviating chronic food shortages are what
Africa now needs. Africa needs agricultural technologies that
have revolutionized the economies of rich countries. Africa
wants to stop relying on rich countries for food handouts.
It is irresponsible on the part of Mr. Hansen and his ilk
to claim GM food must carry labels because biotech firms behave
irresponsibly in the conduct of their scientific work.
Mr. Hansen is a well-educated and informed American, and he
knows pretty well that biotech companies work under stringent
regulatory rules. He is alive to the fact that the U.S. Food
and Drug Administration (FDA) would not tolerate biotech firms
that don't adhere to established rules of scientific research.
And then there is the U.S National Academies of Sciences that
enforces code of conduct in clinical trials. Biotech-related
research, just like any other scientific enquiry is subject
to laid-down scientific ethics. Biotech companies adhere to
these ethics.
GMOs have proved beneficial to farmers in countries where
they are cultivated. It's Africa's turn to cultivate and trade
in GMOs without inhibitions.