President
Gloria Macapagal-Arroyo has approved a policy statement on biotechnology
that seeks not only to promote research and development on genetically
modified (GM) crops in the government's aim to increase agricultural
productivity but also to ensure safety and protection to human and the
environment.
In a memorandum, Executive Secretary Alberto G.
Romulo said that Arroyo had agreed to issuing the policy which
acknowledges that biotechnology can be a means to "sustain food
security, provide equitable access to health services, develop industries,
and still preserve the environment."
The government had found the need to establish a policy statement on
biotechnology since various groups have declared opposing opinions on the
use of biotechnology. The policy is expected to draw the line
between the promotion of biotechnology and the caution against its
devastating effect to man and nature. Non-government organizations
including environment-conscious groups as Mother Earth, Masipag, Green
Peace, and the Philippine Peasant Institute have been earlier opposing
field testings on GM foods on their claim against its adverse effects to
health and environment.
Concrete data show, however, that GM crops have been useful in
substantially increasing farm yield as a total of 44.2 million hectares
(M/ha) of land in Argentina, Australia, Canada, Denmark, European Union,
Japan, Netherlands, South Africa, Switzerland, United Kingdom and the
United States are already devoted to GM foods. GM foods there
include herbicide-tolerant soybean, 25.8 M/ha; Bt (bacillus thuringiensis)
corn, 6.8 M/ha; herbicide-tolerant canola, 2.8 M/ha; herbicide-tolerant
corn, 2.1 M/ha; herbicide-tolerant cotton, 1.7 M/ha; and Bt cotton, 1.5
M/ha.
Concerns about the ill effects of GM crops have come up as there
were earlier reports that efforts to kill harmful pests may also kill
useful insects or nontarget organisms in the process of developing the
crops. For one, the insect-resistant Bt corn was said to have
adverse effect on the propagation of Monarch butterfly larvae.
Scientists, however, answered the fears against the effects of the
development of GM crops.
"Our study was conducted in the laboratory and while it raises an
important issue, it would be inappropriate to draw any conclusions about
the risk to Monarch (butterfly) populations in the field solely on these
initial results," scientists said.
According to the International Service for the Acquisition of Agribiotech
Applications, questions that must be answered in the development of GM
crops are:
"Does the GM food have a traditional counterpart that has a history
of safe use; has the concentration of any naturally occurring toxins or
allergens in the food changed; have the levels of key nutrients
changed? Do new substances in the FM food have a history of safe
use? has the food's digestibility been affected? Has the food
been produced using accepted, established procedures?" (MB)